Skip to main content
Version: Next (release 26)

1D parallel plate discharge

Parallel plate discharge in argon using dual frequency excitation​

We validated our PIC-MC implementation with that from Donko081 by comparing our results for a 1d3v simulated parallel plate discharge in argon. Hereby a dual frequency excitation is applied, i.e. a 13.56 MHz and a 27.12 MHz cosine signal is superposed with an amplitude of 315 volts.

GMSH geometry model for the 1D simulation setup Resulting voltage for dual frequency superposition
Figure 1: Left: GMSH geometry model for the 1D simulation setup. Right: Applied voltage on powered (top) electrode.
ParameterSettingUnit
Argon pressure0.2[Torr]
Amplitude315[V]
Frequency13.56 + 27.12[MHz]
Electrode distance6.5[cm]
Electron time step1e-11[s]
Cell spacing1 x 1 x 1[mm3 ]
Charge weighting1e6[-]
Secondary electron yield0.2 (> 0.1 to approximate electron reflection)[-]
Electron reflection on wallNone[-]
Electron energy partitioningone-takes-it-all[-]

Table 1: PIC-MC settings and simulation parameters used for the dual frequency discharge.

The results are nearly identical for both PIC-MC implementations, like seen for example in the ar+ hit histogram on the powered and grounded electrode, respectively. However, we had some discrepancies at first as we used a more simplified ar+ collision model as in Donko08. Thus, we adjusted our model to that of Donko08 using the more sophisticated ar+ collision model from Phelps.

Ar+ histogram from Donko08Ar+ histogram from ISTAr+ histogram from IST using simplified ar+ collision scheme

Figure 2: Ar+ hit histogram for different PIC-MC implementations and ar+ collision models, respectively.

Footnotes​

  1. Z. Donkó, PIC simulations of the separate control of ion flux and energy in CCRF discharges via the electrical asymmetry effec, 2008 ↩